Evolutionary Improvements vs. Revolutionary Changes in Corporate Restructuring

Written By Michael Hofer, Ph.D.

When we talk about restructuring, we often think of revolutionary quick changes, but it doesn't necessarily have to be that way. You can approach restructuring in many different ways. The only thing that is common is that it leads to significant changes versus the status quo. In this blog post, I discuss two distinct ways. One is a revolutionary approach with a quick change, the other one is about evolutionary improvements. Depending on the goals of your restructuring program and your company's management philosophy, you can choose which approach is better for you. You can also combine both and decide to quickly change some of the issues and others step-by-step. Let's dive into the differences.

Michael Hofer, Ph.D.

Michael Hofer is a global thinker, practitioner, and storyteller, blending over two decades of international leadership with a passion for helping others thrive—in business and in life.

With a Ph.D., MBA, MSA, CPA, and Wharton credentials, he is an expert in mergers and acquisitions, guiding companies to grow strategically and sustainably. His writing distills complex M&A concepts into actionable insights for executives and entrepreneurs navigating deals. More on www.bymichaelhofer.com.

Living with type 1 diabetes, Michael also inspires readers to lead healthier, more vibrant lives. His books, including “Eat, Move, Heal,” offer practical wisdom on improving heart health, mastering blood sugar, and building resilience. More on www.healthy-diabetes.com.

Fluent in five languages and endlessly curious, he writes to empower others to unlock extraordinary results—professionally and personally.

Sign up to read this post
Join Now
Previous

Rethinking Restructuring: Why a Holistic Approach Drives Better Results
Next

Artificial Intelligence: Revolutionizing Corporate Restructuring